Readers Digest
Magazine subscription Podcast
HomeCultureFilm & TV

Review: Gold—rowdy adventure starring Matthew McConaughey

BY Mike McCahill

1st Jan 2015 Film & TV

Review: Gold—rowdy adventure starring Matthew McConaughey

A paunchy Matthew McConaughey’s hunt for gold in the Indonesian rainforests offers its own rewards, reports Mike McCahill.

For all the talk of a “McConaissance”—that process by which Matthew McConaughey was saved from nickel-and-dime rom-coms and returned to the Hollywood big leagues—the actor’s eye for a script has seemed erratic of late. True, he earned an Oscar for 2013’s Dallas Buyers Club, and acclaim for his chameleonic work on TV’s True Detective.

Yet he struck out with last year’s Free State of Jones, a true-life slavery story converted into painfully windy Oscar bait, and he’s been snubbed again for his work on Gold—though this new project at least allows him a modicum of fun, some of which trickles down to the audience.

gold-movie-images-stills-matthew-mcconaughey-tiger.png

That McConaughey was serious about returning to the podium can be seen in the physical transformation he undergoes here. As independently-minded prospector Kenny Wells, the sometime Magic Mike heartthrob presents to us with a thinning hairdo reminiscent of Little Britain’s Andy, a beer gut on a par with Christian Bale’s in American Hustle, and an endlessly distracting snaggletooth.

What Stephen Gaghan’s film marvels at, beyond this conspicuous make-under, is how this unprepossessing schlub came to make a killing in the rainforests of Indonesia, the last place anybody was looking at the back end of the 1980s. There’s an element of risk here comparable to Wells’ own gamble in going East to make his fortune.

 

"McConaughey’s charisma helps to get us on side and carry us along"

 

 

Gaghan, the screenwriter of Traffic who turned director with 2005’s Syriana, is betting on multiplex audiences becoming piqued and compelled by the dry-sounding detail of international mining rights. Some of the spadework has been done by that run of big-business stories that are presumably easier to pitch now that Hollywood studios are owned by major conglomerates: Gold is the adventure-movie variant of The Social Network, Moneyball or The Big Short, making its biggest deals in the great outdoors.

McConaughey’s charisma helps to get us on side and carry us along. The first half, introducing Wells as another American dreamer, can seem uncritical: with nothing in place to do for the titular element what There Will Be Blood did for oil, our hero gets rich awfully quick.

matthew-mc.jpg

This, however, proves intentional, a mid-film twist reconfiguring this story’s entire nature, while repositioning the protagonist as the last of a dying breed. Put it this way: should the incoming President demand a White House screening, he might start to shift uncomfortably in his throne somewhere around the halfway mark.

For everybody else, Gold will serve as a broadly watchable entertainment, gilded as it is with choice period hits and supporting players capable of doing a lot with those small sections of screen the star isn’t hungrily devouring.

 

"Gaghan seems unsure whether his subject deserves comeuppance or a reward"

 

 

Edgar Ramirez plays it cool as the Sancho Panza-like partner who kept his feet on the ground as Wells’ head disappeared further into the clouds; the dependable Corey Stoll and Bill Camp are the Gordon Gekko types Wells sorely regrets getting into bed with; Bryce Dallas Howard radiates as Kay, the great love our guy lost the minute he began treating her as a secretary.

Nobody’s mining too deep: compared to the subtler dramatic accomplishments currently on release, Gold looks to have been conceived as a platform for an enjoyably showy central turn. (The scene in which McConaughey-as-Wells collects an industry award might have been too blatant even for Academy voters.)

gold-movie-images-stills-edgar-ramirez-matthew-mcconaughey_0.png

Up until the last, Gaghan seems unsure whether his subject deserves comeuppance or a reward—and, therefore, whether the film entire is a cautionary tale or just a colourful character study. Still, if you felt inclined to catch one of 2017’s Oscar also-rans, this one wouldn’t be an entirely unworthy investment of time and money.

 

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for more film stories

Enjoyed this story? Share it!

This post contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you. Read our disclaimer

Loading up next...
Stories by email|Subscription
Readers Digest

Launched in 1922, Reader's Digest has built 100 years of trust with a loyal audience and has become the largest circulating magazine in the world

Readers Digest
Reader’s Digest is a member of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (which regulates the UK’s magazine and newspaper industry). We abide by the Editors’ Code of Practice and are committed to upholding the highest standards of journalism. If you think that we have not met those standards, please contact 0203 289 0940. If we are unable to resolve your complaint, or if you would like more information about IPSO or the Editors’ Code, contact IPSO on 0300 123 2220 or visit ipso.co.uk